BP Redux: Oil Spill vs Leaky Buildings – The Surprising Truth
In today’s world, when a group of people in a community set out to create a new building, or improve an existing one, the crucial question each of must ask ourselves and each other is - “In 10 years, 20 years, 50 years will this building be part of the solution, or will be part of the problem?”
Every decision we make when we’re designing and building sends a message to our community, the next generation and to the world at large about our respect for ourselves, each other, and the environment in which we live in and rely on. Many efforts deemed as “good enough” today will inevitably reveal themselves to be woefully inadequate in a not too distant future where escalating energy prices reflect the true cost of our dwindling precious resources. These decisions are an enormous responsibility and require a shift in thinking from short term fixes to long term planning.
Essentially have two choices. We can design, build and retrofit with the idea that we will always have fossil fuels and saddle our families and communities with liabilities. Or, we can design, build and retrofit to address the fact that the emerging economy is one that must be based on energy conservation practices and products and sustainable sources of energy. Choosing to do the latter leaves our families and communities a legacy of assets that will actually benefit instead of burden them. I, for one, am not thrilled about the idea of my hard-earned retirement savings being gobbled up in energy costs associated with poorly planned and poorly built buildings, nor for that matter, poorly sealed oil wells.
After almost 3 continuous months (85 days) and 4.9 million barrels of leaked oil, with the assistance of Halliburton, BP finally plugged the oil well gushing into in the Gulf of Mexico on July 15th. Bloomberg Newsweek reported on August 9th that according to BP, the cost of stopping and cleaning up the oil spill had risen to $6.1 billion. BP has set aside $32.2 billion and is selling its assets to pay for the world’s largest offshore accidental oil spill.
I found myself wondering, in addition to all the money, human, animal and plant life being sacrificed to maintain this addiction to fossil fuels, just how much usable energy was wasted by this spill?
There are 5.8 million BTU’s or 1700 kWh per barrel of crude oil. But we can’t count all of the energy contained in crude oil, since fossil fuels have to be combusted to release the energy contained within them. Also, because we don’t actually use oil as a feedstock for power plants, we have to look to fuel oil, coal and natural gas to get a sense of relative combustion efficiencies. Excluding transmission losses, the average efficiency of coal-fired power plants is 31%, while natural gas-fired power plants have an efficiency of around 58%. Using a conservative efficiency rate of 30% to look at the actual “usable” energy contained in the spilled oil:
4.9 million barrels crude spilled =
2.5 billion usable kWh wasted (at 30% combustion efficiency assumption) =
The energy needed to power 89,756 average US homes for a year
As of the 2008 census, there were about 130 million housing units in the US. The majority of them leak. The energy lost through inefficient single and dual pane windows alone can be up to 40 percent of a building’s heating and cooling energy. According to the DOE, this energy loss is costing consumers approximately $35 billion per year. They leak energy, greenhouse gas emissions, and money. So how does the energy wasted by our homes every year compare to the more visible catastrophe of the BP oil spill? According to the EIA’s most up to date Residential Energy Consumption figures, in 2008 an average US home used 27,842 kWh.
We can all agree that at least 15% of that 27,842 kWh is wasted energy. Now, if we were to do some thoughtful planning and retrofitting, 30% - 50% of that average energy consumption could be eliminated. If we do deep energy retrofits, and build to standards such as Passivhaus (Passive House), we can eliminate 80% of that energy consumption – and save money, month after month.
Take the Empire State Building as an example. It is currently undergoing a retrofit that will reduce energy use by 38% and save $4.4 million in energy costs every year. The retrofit, including the window upgrade of all its dual pane windows, will pay for itself in 3 years. And so goes the saying: if we can do it in the Empire State Building (an 80+ year old iconic tower), we can do it anywhere.
Zero energy buildings will be and must be our future. If we can build and retrofit buildings TODAY that use 20% of the energy that typical buildings use, then I consider the other 80% of the total energy a typical US home uses as “wasted”. That energy is not only a burden on our ecosystems, but also a burden on our power distribution grids. From that perspective, here’s a breakdown of the energy we are wasting with our leaky, poorly insulated houses:
Energy Wasted/Year by US Homes = 1,150 BP Oil spills
Energy Wasted /Day by US Homes = 3 BP Oil Spills
Astounding! To date, the BP Oil Spill is the world’s largest offshore accidental spill, but it is dwarfed by the amount of fossil fuels we are wasting to power our buildings every day! This in my opinion is the real call to action! The good news is that cost-effective methodologies and technologies available NOW can turn this around to the point where our buildings are so efficient that they can power our cars with the extra energy they produce, and we can be done with this dead-end petroleum addiction. And save us real money while we are at it. This blog series aim to offer some straight talk on energy and building science and provide some tools and inspiring ideas to “Build it Forward”!
Research sources include: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html and http://bioenergy.ornl.gov/papers/misc/energy_conv.html
About the Author: Prudence Ferreira is the Founder and Principal of Integral Impact Inc, a high-performance building and energy consultancy with a focus on Passivhaus and Zero Energy Buildings. Prudence serves as President for both Passive House California and the USGBC Redwood Empire and as a Living Building Challenge Ambassador. Her credentials include Building Performance Analyst, CEA/CEPE, HERS I, II +PV Rater, Certified Passive House Consultant, LEED AP, LEED for Homes Rater, GreenPoint Rater, Certified Permaculture Designer and ISO 14001 Lead Auditor. Follow Prudence on Twitter.


















